On Feb 15, 2005, at 5:16 PM, David Brownell wrote:

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 7:00 am, Kumar Gala wrote:
 > David,

So far as I know, David Howells has nothing to do with that tree.
 He may be as puzzled as me about why you're asking him the question!

Sorry, this is what I get for sending email first thing in the morning.

> I was wondering what the state of the
> usb-gadget.bkbits.net:8080/gadget-2.4 tree was.� It appears that some
> changes got accepted into this tree (ARC EHCI TT host support).

State of that tree is much the same as other 2.4 kernel trees:� it's
 not getting updates.� Except maybe for critical patches, and the
 occasional pull of 2.4.current (which anyone can do into their own
 clone).� The primary purpose of that tree is to hold 2.4 versions of
 the gadget framework code; anything else is gravy.

In particular, note www.linux-usb.org/usb2.html highlights the fact
that "2.4 versions of the EHCI driver are no longer being kept current".
That's both with respect to the www.kernel.org version, and the slightly
different version in that gadget-2.4 tree.




> Is there a patch of this against some stock 2.4 tree around somewhere?

No, but they're easy to generate.� In fact, see the BK-HOWTO in the
 kernel documentation directory ... there's a very useful command at
 the end.

Ok, well do, just wasnt sure what was on the shelf already.

= kumar



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to