On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 06:01:46PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 16:25:36 -0800 Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> 
> > > > Use wait_event_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue code. Remove
> > > > now unused variables.
> > > 
> > > What is the purpose of this change?
> 
> > [...] It provides a
> > *good* example to copy&paste developers. It also means this is one less
> > place that needs to be modified for eventually virtualized (tickless)
> > kernels.
> 
> All right, I agree.
> 
> But I was surprised to see two patches either from you or Domen, marked
> 1/2 and 2/2, first changing the code and then removing it altogether.

Ah ha! Now I see why you asked. 1/2 should be dropped, will send mail
indicating the same now.

Thanks,
Nish


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to