On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:34:39 -0800 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you try the usbmon code? It's in the -mm releases and now in > Linus's tree. It will show up in the next main release too. It's much > better at watching the usb data than the printk() method.
Well, usbmon is better in theory, but not in practice yet. Glen wants to capture 100% of data. Here's the quote: > I'm trying to sniff the firmware of a USB2 DVB-T receiver, using 2.6.10 and > vmware. I saw Greg Kroah-Hartman's article in Linux Journal, and tried to > use his snooping support. The device is working(slowly) in vmware. This is the job I assigned to as-yet-not-existing "binary" interface. The usbmon in Linus' tree only has "text" interface, which clips data on purpose: only first 32 bytes are captured. It ought to be trivial to write something which would capture all the data, by copying mon_text.c and modifying it. Well, at least I think it trivial. I tried to make that code as transparent and straightforward as possible. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
