On Thursday 17 March 2005 1:54 am, Brian Murphy wrote: > Executive summary: > loop until dependant device list is empty instead of for loop over > changing list.
In various other cases I've found that list_for_each_safe() is actually not safe, and so I've had to switch to that same sort of while-not-empty idiom. This makes me wonder about either compiler issues or basic semantic issues with the definition of "safe" ... I leaned towards thinking that "safe" was a misnomer, probably just shorthand for "safe_except_for_what_you_really_want". - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
