On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 01:12:29AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 01:05 +0200, Georges Toth wrote: > > > Maybe 1.0 would be better (1.0, because the driver is ready for production, > > and no beta-ware) > > > > What do you think ? > > Personally, I think 1.0 < 1.05 so that has a weird feel to it as well. I > guess I'd just call it 2.0 ;)
Personally, driver version numbers don't mean a thing at all. Randomize them for all I care. What matters is the version of the kernel you are using, you can track the driver version from that. Unless your driver is getting included in distros that apply it as a patch (as libata and tg3 does.) thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/info/Sentarus/hamr30 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
