> I seriously doubt that the poster does the testing on the same hardware. I'm sorry but how exactly did you reach this conclusion ? Sadly we can only afford 1 machine so, yes, all my testing is done on the same machine and with exactly the same hardware.
Owen On Saturday 09 Apr 2005 02:31, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 15:06:23 -0700 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (It worked in 2.4 kernels..) > > > > Apr 8 22:08:19 opc kernel: hub 1-0:1.0: port 1 disabled by hub (EMI?), > > re-enabling... Apr 8 22:08:20 opc kernel: usb 1-1: reset full speed USB > > device using uhci_hcd and address 2 Apr 8 22:08:20 opc kernel: usb 1-1: > > device not accepting address 2, error -22 > > > > The device works fine under 2.4 and Windoze. > > I seriously doubt that the poster does the testing on the same hardware. > > -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
