On Monday 11 April 2005 1:13 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, 11. April 2005 21:07 schrieb Alan Stern: > > That's just it. �The first part applies only when an URB completes with a > > hardware error, _not_ an unlink or kill! �Do you think this needs to be > > made more clear? �The second part applies when an URB terminates because > > Yes, you should make very clear that i isn't an error although an error > code is returned.
That's exactly why I use the word "fault" in such cases. Not all faults are errors. It's normal usage; e.g. a "page fault" normally just tells the system to update memory maps, rather than trigger some sort of error report. - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
