Am Donnerstag, 28. April 2005 02:26 schrieb David Brownell:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2005 2:32 pm, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > That's not in question. The issue is: Out of all the drivers floating
> > around, which one should decide when a particular device can be suspended
> > for lack of activity?
>
> Erm, not just _one_ can do it. Certainly any interface's driver can know
> that it's now idle; for example, if a network interface is down, that
> particular interface can be suspended (then resumed later as needed).
Please consider scsi. It has no idea about what is going on.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
