On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:07:15AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sat, 21 May 2005 02:08:47 -0400, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > [...]  It's not a correct fix, but due to time constraints
> > (and paranoia) I'm opting for the simplest fix that works.
> 
> > @@ -2791,6 +2791,7 @@
> >             usb_unlock_device(hdev);
> >             usb_put_intf(intf);
> >  
> > +           msleep(25);
> >          } /* end while (1) */
> >  }
> 
> I'm glad this works for you, though the remaining problem is that if
> we do not get a fix in mainline, you're bound to hit it again...

I'm more concerned that others will hit it.  I hope that somebody that knows
the code better than I finds a real fix, or that the code evolves beyond it
(not holding the hub lock for a second or more, etc).  I just can't risk
regressions right now ...

-- 
Glenn Maynard


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to