On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 11:23:06AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey, where did that patch even come from? It's clearly wrong > to _demand_ that the hardware support MWI.
It came from me. I added a patch that makes sure that we check the return value of all pci functions. This was one place where we were not, so I thought it was an error. > If MWI works, fine ... cache coherence will be cheaper. > If it's not available, big deal. Ok, I'll change it to only give a debug message then. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
