Ian Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/08/2005 09:30, Uwe Bonnes wrote: > > at the moment (2.6.13-rc4) ftdi_chars_in_buffer() unconditionally return > > 0. Shouldn't this function at least check the FTDI_RS_TEMT bit in Byte1 > > (Line Status)?
> I don't think so, but it shouldn't really return zero until all write > URBs currently in-flight have completed; in other words, all outstanding > write data has been sent to the UART. This is what the "normal" serial > drivers do; they don't wait for the UART's transmit FIFO to drain. I would be pleased, if anybody could take that job. The USB driver internals are out of reach for me at the moment... -- Uwe Bonnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ---------- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
