On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 08:53:21PM -0400, David Hollis wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:07 -0700, David Brownell wrote: > > Sometimes it's almost trivial to write a driver ... so in a feat of > > apalling lack-of-originality they go into "simple.c". > > > > I am wondering if naming the module 'simple' is wise regarding the > 'global namespace'-ness of it. If I'm looking at an lsmod dump and I > see simple, that really means nothing to me. Maybe usbnet-simple or > usbnet-simp or something like that?
I agree, it should not be called this. usbnet-simple is fine with me, David? thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
