On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 12:19:39PM -0700, Timothy Thelin wrote: > > > > Why would a usb-storage device ever report itself as scsi0 > > if it actually > > > supports scsi3? Is it because the USB/ATA bridge spec > > doesn't support asking > > > the device it self, so the usb-subsystem just makes an (un? > > ;)-educated > > > guess? Or is it because it is possible, but the devices > > can't be trusted to > > > tell the truth? > > > > It's the last one. Lots and lots of devices lie outright about this. > > > > Matt > > I don't suppose you might have an alternative solution for allowing > scsi0 devices to accept things like the SCSI-ATA passthru cdb unmangled > by LUN info then?
What's the command source?
If you're coming in via the SG interface, there's a command flag to set
which prevents LUN info from being imposed on the CDB.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
NYET! The evil stops here!
-- Pitr
User Friendly, 6/22/1998
pgpuTGGnNzQtW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
