On Gwe, 2005-09-16 at 15:24 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > I see why you would want to merge them, but is it worth the trouble? > They are not identical. For one thing, early handoff installs its own > fake interrupt handlers (Alan Cox insisted on it in the RHEL > implementation).
You need them because an IRQ could be pending on the channel at the point you switch over or triggered on the switch and a few people saw this behaviour. I'd like to see it shared but that means handoff belongs in the input layer code and the USB layer needs to call into it if appropriate. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel