On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 09:28 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2005-11-01 at 14:30 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Damn, those quirks should really be either more careful or be made > > platform specific if they are x86 junk workarounds. > > USB handoff is fairly x86 specific. The x86 folks took great care to > handle back compatibility while Apple was content to just dump the users > and machines.
What is this comment supposed to mean ? Backward compatiblity on Macs is very high, thanks to mostly software not relying on stupid & broken hardware implementation details... > Not "illegal" -> "invalid". > > Please get that right as we have far too many incorrect uses of > "illegal" in publically visible printk calls. Illegal means "prohibited > by law". Oh well, whatever you say.. Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
