On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:09:38 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about my second suggestion to always use libusual in the two > drivers instead of having two code paths in each of them? I don't see how you would be able to mandate libusual, since it adds (a small amount of) bloat. I foresee some distributions building without it for years. Debian is likely to take such course. We certainly can apply such a patch and tell all complainers to suck it up, but I am not sure if that would be embraced by distro developers. I do not want to risk anything that may derail acceptance into Linus' tree. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
