Pete, I've been looking into adjusting IDLE_TIMEOUT. Unfortunately, I've been dealing with some other issues first. Preliminary testing seems to indicate that adjusting the idle timeout will work, but I need to do some more testing.
Best Regards, --Chris -----Original Message----- From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 5:05 PM To: Frantz, Chris Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: HP iLO needs FSBR On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 17:54:25 -0600, "Frantz, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would agree that the patch is questionable. It appears the only > reason that it helps is that it takes advantage of some unintended > behavior of the FSBR implementation in the current UHCI driver. Chris, did you have a chance to test Alan's suggestion to increase the IDLE_TIMEOUT? I have not got an access to a suitable HP box yet (all I found either runs RHEL 3 or has AMD CPUs with OHCI). Clearly, if usb-uhci worked and uhci-hcd fails, there should be a way to fix this whithout making the higher level drivers to adjust. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
