On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > However it's not clear whether we need to change the scsi_level at all. > > Matt, have you been able to test that patch I posted a while back, the one > > that leaves the level alone? > > For a long-term solution, Mike Anderson's suggestion seems better: > > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2005-November/002120.html > > Since the scsi_level changing code is in mainline, we should probably try > to update it to work, now that James's patch has been applied.
A combination of the two ideas would be best. For now, however, we should quickly get your fix into the main kernel. The real question is whether not setting the level to 2 would upset any currently-working devices. I suppose it would matter only for multi-LUN devices that report themselves as scsi-0. I don't have any examples here to test. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
