Hi, oh, shiny new device files. but why? /proc/bus/usb/00X/00Y works fine for me. why the changes? will usbfs alias /proc/bus/usb be obsoleted?
also are there any differences between those two files? or are they exchangeable? also what about the hotplug interface and udev? I hope I can still count on $DEVICE being the /proc/bus/usb/ device when my hotplug script is being called? and I hope libusb will continue to have filename and dirname as those /proc/bus/usb/<dirname>/<filename> so I can use it to reconstruct the path, and open the right file. (I got a real strange bug report by a debian user with dirname "3" instead of "003" and filename "5" instead of "005", but he libusb code looks fine). In short: I'm confused by the change / new device files. please help. Regards, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
