On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, CaT wrote: > Device works on two other linux boxes (an nvidia2 chipset and an intel > bx laptop chipset) aswell as windows boxes without extra drivers. > > On this VIA based box: > > 0000:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 > Controller (rev 80) > 0000:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 > Controller (rev 80) > 0000:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 > Controller (rev 80) > 0000:00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82) > > I get (from two inserts): > > kernel: [ 111.330762] usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and > address 3 > kernel: [ 112.180267] ub(1.3): Stall at GetMaxLUN, using 1 LUN > kernel: [ 151.843141] usb 1-5: USB disconnect, address 3 > kernel: [ 154.547011] usb 1-5: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and > address 4 > kernel: [ 155.395524] ub(1.4): Stall at GetMaxLUN, using 1 LUN > kernel: [ 177.073446] usb 1-5: USB disconnect, address 4 > > and no device (I expect /dev/sda1). > > .config, dmesg and lspci -vv output for the usb bits attached.
What happens if you don't set CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
