On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:26:17 +0000, Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:20:06AM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > P.S. I am repeating myself as Katon, but I am yet to see why any of > > this matters. Neither Russell nor Oliver ever presented a case where > > an unpacked struct caused breakage in USB. > > If you would like to refresh your memory (which is obviously faulty) > you'll see that my involvement in this thread was merely to answer > a simple question about structure sizes. Isn't it exactly what I just wrote, and you quoted? > It was not a bug report about USB breaking. Therefore, I have no > case to present. The thread started with Oliver posting a patch. And later, he appealed to your authority. It seems that we both are saying that there's no problem, no case, no nothing. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
