On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 17:20:05 -0500, "Doug Sutherland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alan, it looks like this is an outright bug in the 2.4 code because > in different calls to spin_lock functions, the same spinlock_t > structure element is passed by value and then later by reference. This happens when the code was not tested on SMP, because the argument is not used (unless debugging is on). -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
