>> I don't think anybody claimed this isn't a regression for the 600X. > >I narrowed it further. The short story is that this commit (diff below >sig) makes the second S3 sleep go into the endless loop, if the loaded >modules are exactly thermal, processor, intel_agp, and agpgart:
If you believe this patch is the root cause of the regression you have been seeing. Then, I would say the thing is a little bit different with ec_intr=0 and ec_intr=1. Basically, ec_intr=0 will disable EC related ACPI interrupt before finishing _Qxx method execution , but ec_intr=1 always enable EC interrupt. This could cause some hardware/BIOS events get lost under ec_intr=0, which shouldn't lost. We need to figure out what's going on here rather than falling back to ec_intr=0 behavior. --Luming ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
