On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:47:05PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Marc Singer wrote: > > > > > Isn't that the responsibility of the gadget itself and not the UDC? > > > > > > Yes, it is. What gadget driver were you using for your test? > > > > ether.c > > That's your problem. You should be using g_zero. Then test 14 would work > as expected.
Now, you are confused. I *was* testing with gadget zero. Now I'm using the ether driver to see if I can bring-up the link. Gadget zero wouldn't pass test 14, but it certainly is possible that the reason it failed is the same reason that ether isn't sending an interface descriptor for configuration 1. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
