Hi Alan
2006/3/20, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>
> > I'm wondering who is supposed to release/disable the endpoints which
> > have been enabled while the usb driver was running. I took a look to 2
> > different drivers, zero and file_storage drivers, and they both make a
> > different assumption. The former is relying on the udc to release its
> > previously allocated endpoints whereas the futher call
> > udc->ep_disable, except for ep0...
> > What's the rigth thing to do here ? BTW why file_storage driver do not
> > disable ep0 ?
>
> When a gadget driver unregisters, the UDC driver must disable any
> endpoints that were left enabled. So a gadget driver has a choice: It can
> disable endpoints when it unregisters or not; either way is okay. On the
so why not always delegating the job to the UDC drivers ?
Thanks
--
Franck
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
