On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 26 March 2006 9:11 am, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Franck Bui-Huu wrote: > > > > > sorry the question wasn't accurate, I would have asked: am I sure that > > > the driver will queue only one request in a response to a SETUP > > > packet ? that would mean the request queue for ep0 has no more than > > > one request at any time. > > > > You shouldn't assume that. Although it will almost always be true in > > practice, it's not a requirement. > > Actually, I'd say it's OK to assume that. It's an error if the > gadget driver issues more than one response to a setup() callback, > or issues a response when no setup() is pending.
But what if the gadget driver issues a single response in two parts? That is, instead of issuing a single 128-byte response, it queues two 64-byte responses? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
