On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > as alternative, I can use usb functions to claim the interface. > would that also have the desired effect? it might be even better, > as it would allow devices with several integrated components to be > locked only on the endpoint I use, and leave the others open for > other software to use those components.
It probably _would_ have the effect you want, since only one process is allowed to own an interface at any time. > but will claim interface work on the control interface? many tokens > use vendor defined control interrupt sequences :I( Claim-interface will work on any interface that doesn't already have a driver. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
