Sorry, that was a typo from me. Its 2.4.26 or 2.4.32 kernels. Thanks for the feedback. Since the panic is not recreatable, I cannot test this patch. It looks like the only option is to patch the diff and wait & watch.
Prashanth On 5/22/06, Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2006 10:30:05 +0530, "Prashanth Tamraparni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On comparing my kernel with 2.4.21-26 or even 2.4.21-32, I found that > the difference is in ALLOC_FLAGS. GFP_NOIO was used instead of > GFP_KERNEL in newer kernels. [...] I do not know what "2.4.21-26" refers to here. It's not the name of any kernel released by Marcelo. > My concern here is that can I still believe that fixing ALLOC_FLAGS > would solve the issue. I may be asking a basic question here, sorry. Well, you did not ask a question. But if you're asking "can ALLOC_FLAGS cause the problem I'm seeing", the answer is "maybe". The easest way to test is to patch the usb-ohci from 2.4.32 into your 2.4.21 code base. -- Pete
------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
