On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:33:30PM -0300, Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino wrote:
> On Mon, 29 May 2006 22:47:24 +0200
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | 
> | The panic was caused by the read urb being submitten in ipaq_open,
> | regardless of success, and never killed in case of failure. What my
> | patch basically does is to submit the urb only after succesfully sending
> | the control message, and adding a sleep between tries. As long as this
> | patch is not applied, we hardly get any other error because the kernel
> | panics as soon as an ipaq reboots.
> 
>  I see.
> 
>  Did you try to just kill the read urb in the ipaq_open's error path?

Yes, that's what I did at first. It works, but with the long waits (we see
waits up to 80-90 seconds right now) I was afraid that the urb might timeout
before the control message succeeds.

Frank

> 
> -- 
> Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino

-- 
Frank Gevaerts                                 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fks bvba - Formal and Knowledge Systems        http://www.fks.be/
Stationsstraat 108                             Tel:  ++32-(0)11-21 49 11
B-3570 ALKEN                                   Fax:  ++32-(0)11-22 04 19


-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to