On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 11:03:29 +0100, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 23:48 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > > > The tests I've done so far weren't anything serious: as the mobile > > > supports a > > > AT command set, I have used the ones (with minicom) which transfers more > > > data. > > > Of course that I also did module load/unload tests, tried to disconnect > > > the > > > device while it's transfering data and so on. > > > > Next, it would be nice to test if PPP works, and if getty and shell work > > (with getty driving the USB-to-serial adapter). > > xmodem is a good test -- better than PPP because it stresses the > buffering in a way which PPP won't. Log into a remote system, try > sending and receiving files with xmodem.
I understand. My intent was different, however. One of the bigger sticking points for usb-serial was its interaction with line disciplines, which are notorious for looping back and requesting writes from callbacks (e.g. h_hdlc.c). They are also sensitive to drivers lying about the amount of free space in their FIFOs. This is something you never test when driving a serial port from an application, no matter how cleverly written. -- Pete _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
