On Wednesday 14 June 2006 12:05 pm, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Did you test this with remote wakeup on all three HCDs? And with plain > > old external hubs? With and without CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND? I suppose I > > was just a bit surprised to see how much resume-side recursion could > > be removed and have things still work. So I'm curious about just how > > much is known to work. ;) > > I've done some testing, there hasn't been enough time to be really > thorough about it. (This was an example of "Post early, post often" > philosophy.) It works with EHCI and UHCI and external hubs, when > CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND is set. I haven't tried it yet with CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND > unset -- in fact, I haven't yet tried any of this stuff with a system > suspend.
Unit tested, not /sys/power/state integration tested. As I'd expect; there are a _lot_ of configurations that need testing. > > As for testing all this, I guess I'm suspecting that being able to > > do it in a couple groups might be good. And patch seven-of-nine > > is a bout where I start wanting to do very separate tests. :) > > I don't see much point testing this patch without also including the patch > (719) that ties together the devices and interfaces. Although everything > should work without that later patch applied, I didn't intend the changes > to stop short of all nine patches. I'm thinking that I won't have time to test any of this soon, so the notion comes up that getting many "safe" bits into the next set of pages that get merged (in a few weeks?) would be good. - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
