On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:32:33 -0700 Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:11:34 -0300, "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | | > Pete, was it your original idea to completely move from the spinlock | > to a mutex? | | I thought it was the cleanest solution. But perhaps I miss something. | I'll look at your reposted patch again, maybe it's all right as it is. Actually, that's the best solution from the USB-Serial's POV. The problem is that several serial drivers uses the uart_port's spinlock to implement their own locking, and some of them acquires the lock in its interrupt handler... Sh*t. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
