On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Christopher Montgomery wrote:

> The resubmission is in ehci-q.c:qh_completions(); it is not checking
> to see if the device is disconnected (is this possible?

No.

> ) before
> deciding the endpoint EPROTO fault calls for tearing it down and
> setting it back up. Active/submitted URBs potentially have nothing to
> do with it; it is happening even when my devices are idle.

I'm not terribly familiar with ehci-hcd.  Where in qh_completions() does 
the code tear something down and then set it back up again?  What does it 
tear down?

In fact, where in qh_completions() does the code even check for -EPROTO?

When the devices are idle, how can qh_completions() possibly have any work 
to do at all?

> Is this part of what you're referring to as a high level driver?

No.  The higher-level driver is the one that submits URBs.  Examples are 
usb-storage and usb-hid.

Alan Stern


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to