Am Dienstag, 11. Juli 2006 21:22 schrieb Manuel Naranjo:
> > | > | +
> > | > | + port->write_urb_busy = 1;
> > | >
> > | > Shouldn't you protect this with the spinlock?
> > | You mean making an spinlock before changing the value, and
> > | a spinunlock after changing the value?
> >
> > Yes, but I just checked and it seems that all the drivers which uses it
> > does exactly what you did.
> >
> > And now I wonder whether they're buggy or not.
> Don't have even an Idea.
>
IIRC this is called already under spinlock. Thus the drivers are correct.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
