[snip] >> Well, I think there is a coupling that exists between whatever your >> boot rom is and the kernel. If you are trying to optimize boot time >> I'd say one thing you would want is to avoid multiple writing the >> same configuration registers. >> >> I dont have an issue if a fixed function board decides to do these >> things in their kernel init instead of their boot rom. I however, >> don't want thousand and one config options to support all the various >> ways one can configure the Freescale board. > > We won't have the thousand and one config options, making use of the > device > tree. So this is not a problem.
I'm talking about opening the door to a ton of options, not that we have them now. For example, your patch doesnt handle the USB PHYs if they are on the MDS instead of the SYS board. It doesn't handle setting SCCR properly for different frequency choices. I'm concerned about where to draw the line because of all the ways a user can configure the MDS board. - kumar ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
