On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 08:12:33AM -0400, Christopher Montgomery wrote: > Hello David and Greg, > > I've completed an incremental version of my patchset for the new EHCI > scheduler. It is broken up into 14 seperate patches and each > incremental yields a valid/working ehci scheduler. Naturally, > they're all meant to all be applied at once but they can be evaluated > individually. They're slightly more up to date than my most recent > monolithic version of the patch. > > (there is a 15th patch that is needed by USB audio to work properly > with a periodic scheduler that reliably reports underruns) > > Some amount of each patch is modification of code that is eventually > eliminated by the end; however, this was necessary for each patch to > stand on its own. For this reason, although each patch was tested > individually, I trust each patch in isolation somewhat less than the > result of applying the whole. There is also a substantial amount of > code movement and refactoring for no functional change, such that > later functional changes are smaller/better contained/easier to > understand. > > The files are at: > > http://web.mit.edu/xiphmont/Public/kernel/incremental/20060921/ > > Should I post them to the list or this sufficient?
Please post them. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
