On 10/8/06, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Christopher "Monty" Montgomery wrote:
> > [or are you worried about caching and propogation of changes?] > > No, I'm just pointing out that it's not always possible to tell at > submission time whether the submission was made early enough. All xruns should be caught, no argument here. > > > Actually that's a good description of the case where that -EXDEV fault > > > might reasonably be reported at completion. > > > > Yes, agreed, if we really can't reliably figure it out ahead of time. > > I don't like the idea of having two separate pathways for reporting the > same kind of error. If one reporting technique is reliable and another > isn't, why keep the unreliable one? When one can say 'the underrun is happening now' and the other simply says 'an underrun happened some time ago, too late to do anything timely.' Monty ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
