On 10/9/06, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 09 October 2006 9:02 am, Christopher "Monty" Montgomery wrote: > > On 10/9/06, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Exactly why I'm reminding you that your driver -- queueing only one > > > URB at a time -- is the source of a **LOT** of your problemss. > > > > I've not heard any other plausible suggestions other than repeated > > assertions that 'Linux can't do that'. > > I fail to understand how "do it THIS way not THAT way" is anything > other than a plausible suggestion....
So far, it has been "do it THIS way not THAT way" inoring the fact that "THIS way" doesn't work. Cannot work. You have not dusputed the fact that 4ms of buffering requirement precludes 2ms of latency. "I need 2ms latency". "Do it the way we're doing it." "Uhh.. that is barely working for 50ms latency right now. And even if we got optimal performance, it could never theoretically get down to 2ms." "Too bad. This is The Way." Monty ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
