Hi, On Monday 06 November 2006 16:12, Alan Stern wrote: > > But i am confused that my libusb based client can just omit to claim the > > device and then send the commands anyway ... > > If USB_TYPE_VENDOR is set in bRequestType then the request will always be > allowed, regardless of the recipient field. Maybe that's your problem. > Try using USB_TYPE_CLASS instead. Ok, that may be the culprit. I'll try that soon.
In the meantime i have released the first version (still based on vendor transfers) just to get the thing started and to allow the interested to people to just give it a try. The protocol is not finished as you probably have noticed from this thread, so expect future versions to be incompatible to this first one. Have a look at http://www.harbaum.org/till/i2c_tiny_usb if you are interested. Regards, Till -- Dr.Ing. Till Harbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.harbaum.org/till ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
