On 11/7/06, Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hm, I thought that for some reason since this only depended on the EHCI > > scheduler code,
Correct > >that it was going to be rolled into that big patchset > > the next time it was released. Oh, I'd been submitting incrementals since The Big Patchset went in; the pool naming fix was the first incremental I sent after. > I don't know; the decision about rolling it in with the other patchset is > up to Monty. In fact, I don't remember if he even noticed that patch when > it first got sent in. Do you want me to maintain my changes as a big seperable patchset? I can see again, and so I've gotten back to work on the remaining needed changes. > In the meantime, since the new scheduler code is already in your USB > development tree, I think this patch should go in there as well. I prefer > to do new development and testing in a kernel without known bugs. :-) I'll also get an incremental out for clean unlinking the master restore FSTN before cleanup; the error it logs is harmless, but a bug nonetheless. Monty ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
