On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:58:56AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > On Monday 27 November 2006 8:31 am, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > If it is abandoned code I suggest that it is removed, or if not, that the > > patch be applied, because it will backfire later on. > > The patch is wrong, so it should not be applied. > > I'd support either fixing the code _the right_ way (as explained in the > comment preceding the only potential problematic usage, during driver > shutdown) or removing it. > > Removing it would be best, IMO.
Fair enough, I've dropped it now. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
