On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, José Alfredo Cañizo Rincón wrote: > > There are a few possibilities. For example, we could add a sysfs > > attribute file listing ports which should not be monitored for > > an overcurrent condition. > > Sounds good to me. The thing is, I have no idea on how to go about doing > this, I'm not familiar with this code or kernel programming at all. Of > course, if you find the time to propose a patch I'll be willing to try it > and add any other info you may need.
When I have time I will write a patch for you to try. Remind me about it if I don't get back to you in a week or so. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
