On 12/6/06, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > I still have the same objection - the "simple'" code will have to be > > > compiled into the driver instead of being a separate module and > > > eventyally will lead to a monster-size HID module. We have this issue > > > with psmouse to a degree but with HID the growth potential is much > > > bigger IMO. > > I guess that this paragraph wasn't for me, but rather for the author of > the HID Simple Driver proposal, am I right?
Yes, mainly for him but also for you because we need to be able to do what Li Yu is trying to do and be able to tweak HID interfaces. ... > This split is quite painful, as there are many things happening in USB all > the time, so the best way seem to be just to perform big split (with > needed changes) at once, and then develop other things on top of it (like > hidraw). Is there any reason why we can't mecanically move everything into drivers/hid right now? Then Greg could simply forward all patches he gets for HID your way and you won't have hard time merging your work with others... -- Dmitry ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
