Am Mittwoch, 31. Januar 2007 14:18 schrieb Jiri Kosina:
> > > with both the flags unset (if a timeout doesn't happen sooner, which is
> > > OK). If this "final" wake_up() is called before the usbhid_wait_io() is
> > > called, this is also OK, because then the condition will evaluate to true
> > > and the task won't event sleep on the waitqueue.
> > Who tells you that the flags will still be cleared? Somebody else may
> > have called usbhid_submit_report() by the time you check the flags.
>
> Yes, but in such case it is again guaranteed that there will be wake_up()
> coming from the URB submission which happened later - either the flags are
> cleared, or wake_up() will eventually happen (you are right that it might
> possibly be wake_up() corresponding to submission of URB submitted later,
> but does that matter?).
Yes, as you cannot make sure it'll come before the timeout strikes, nor
can you make sure the condition will be true when a second URB finishes.
This logic can fail under load.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
