On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:53:31PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Greg:
> > 
> > When you refactored the USB device-matching code, you may have introduced 
> > a bug.  Does it seem reasonable that an entry might contain both 
> > device-specific and interface-specific criteria to match?
> 
> I don't know of any such entries, do you?

No, I don't.  This is just a matter of being theoretically correct instead 
of theoretically wrong.  After all, it's not a highly invasive patch!  :-)

> Is this something that we want to support?

Why not?  The data structures already allow for it, and there's nothing in 
the documentation that says people shouldn't do it.

Alan Stern


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to