On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:26:36 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It would not, if le16_to_cpu took a pointer to u8. But as it is, > > functions are quite different. > > That's what casts are for. However, why do you have no type information > in the first place? Untyped data is risky. You are right, the traditionalist way is weak in this regard. And I saw people applying ntohs to a long and vice versa before. However, don't you discard the typing as well whenever get_unaligned is involved? The function itself is always sized correctly with the use of typeof, but then it returns u64 and thus the subsequent le16_to_cpu becomes unchecked. I think Alan was on to something with his sized get_unaligned ideas. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
