On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:58:17PM +0000, Phil Endecott wrote:
[]
> This patch is:
> "Prevent an unaligned exception to occur. (GCC 4.1) tmp is defined as char
> pointer while it is later accessed as short."
>
> This is, in a sense, the opposite of what we're looking at. There they
> have added aligned(2) to a char; that makes it more aligned so it's
> safe. Adding packed attributes reduces the alignment, which is not
> always safe.
Your intro pseudo-code:
| g() {
| char c;
| struct S s; /* packed or not */
| (s.intfield)++;
| f(&s);
| }
Due to `c', `s' gets to be unaligned, i.e. light turned before you've
touched a switch: layout of `c' is independed, it's a byte, not followed
by a byte, thus must be padded. No?.
If this wasn't acknowledged by gcc guys as a bug, maybe bigger-first,
manual padding is solution (or many other things, that original
developers have in mind, rather than haven't, while implementing,
testing, using GCC).
Anyways, i salute to guys, who have made AVR and MSP430 GCC ports, thus i
could get some understanding of things. And, i think, they are ordinary:
as me and you. So what's the problem to hack and to send patch? Of
course, ARM stuff is buried alive in chips, users, etc (:.
(still slight off topic, sorry if any)
____
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
