> > We go to considerable lengths to present interfaces as devices. Each
> > interface would be its own input device to user space. We should not
> > make it important which logical devices are grouped together physically.
>
> Taken to its logical conclusion, your argument says that the inactivity
> delay shouldn't be set at the USB layer at all -- it should be set at the
> input layer and propagated up somehow.
Indeed. Now we could again debate whether autosuspend belongs into
USB at all.
[..]
> autosuspend_delay > 0 && test_and_clear_bit(DEVICE_BUSY, ...) == 0
>
> where autosuspend_delay <= 0 means the user wants the interface never to
> be autosuspended. If any of the test_and_clear_bit() checks fail, you
> want the routine to set the next timeout to the maximum of the
> corresponding autosuspend_delay values.
Yes.
> All this in addition to the standard device-wide autosuspend delay, which
> will also be settable via sysfs. The initial timeout value should be set
> to the maximum of the device-wide delay and the interface delays.
>
> Is that right?
Yes.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
