I think the source file should be the original data source (MS file), The Pascal file is one derivation of from, it still may be under the MS license.
That is my guess, I am not familiar with the legal very well. Robert Marquardt wrote: > Liyu wrote: > >> It is great resource, and I guess its legality is decided by the license >> of source file. > > The question is "What is the source file?". My Pascal conversion or > the MS original. The Pascal conversion is only using the names from > Microsoft so the file is compatible but not a copy. > I will put the conversion back to C under the GPL of course. > > If it is legal i want the file in the kernel sources to encourage all > developers (kernel or user) to use symolic usage names instead of hex > cvalues. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
