On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:43:30 +0100, Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> static struct usb_serial *serial_table[SERIAL_TTY_MINORS]; /* initially > all NULL */ > +static u32 deathrow[SERIAL_TTY_MINORS/32]; /* disconnected > but open*/ Can you tell me why do you use a bitmap instead of putting the flag into a port? It would only make sense if you wanted to set or clear the flag when port is NULL, which you do not. Your accessor functions reference port->number. Is there a reason why you don't add a poison flag near the new field "busy" which you added? > static spinlock_t table_lock; > static LIST_HEAD(usb_serial_driver_list); > +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(usbserial_henchman); Why is this static instead of per-serial? -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
